Saturday, 8 June 2013
The Ogham stones of Scotland are more typologically diverse and linguistically intriguing than those of any other part of Britain and Ireland. There are about 34 confirmed Ogham inscriptions on pillar stones, symbol stones, cross slabs, and natural rock faces, as well as five Ogham inscriptions that have been found on portable artefacts :
Location of Ogham Inscriptions in Scotland
Red tags mark the sites of certain Ogham stone inscriptions (a dot indicates that the stone is in situ)
Yellow tags mark the sites of dubious or unconfirmed Ogham stone inscriptions
Green tags mark sites where an Ogham-inscribed portable artefact was found
Blue tags mark museums or other sites where Ogham stones are held
The distribution of Ogham inscriptions across Scotland reflects the political geography of Scotland during the 5th through 10th centuries, when most of Scotland north of the Forth-Clyde line, including the Outer Hebrides, the Orkney Islands and the Shetland Islands, were under the control of various Pictish kingdoms, whereas the southwest part of Scotland north of the Forth-Clyde line, including many of the Inner Hebridean islands, and part of northern Ireland were under the control of the Gaelic kingdom of Dalriada :
Linguistic Map of Britain & Ireland in the mid-5th century AD
Map by Asarlaí, CC BY-SA 3.0
Green = Mainly Goidelic areas
Blue = Mainly Pictish areas
Red = Mainly Brythonic areas
All of Scotland north of the Forth-Clyde line was originally inhabited by Picts, but during the post-Roman period, from the late 5th century onwards, the southwest corner of Pictland was colonized by Gaelic-speaking settlers ("Scots") from Ireland, and by the middle of the 6th century the Gaelic kingdom of Dalriada covered part of northern Ireland and the islands and coastal areas of the southwest corner of Scotland north of the Forth-Clyde line.
Irish Settlements in Western Britain
Source : Lloyd Laing, The Archaeology of Late Celtic Britain and Ireland, c. 400–1200 AD (Methuen, 1975) Fig. 1
There are only three Ogham stones in the parts of Scotland corresponding to the Gaelic kingdom of Dalriada, all on or very near the coastline. Two of these are classic Ogham pillar stones with a Goidelic language Ogham inscription engraved along one of the natural edges of the stone, such as are found in Ireland : one on the island of Gigha (GIGHA/1) which has a typical "X, son of Y" formula; and one on the mainland at Poltaloch (POLCH/1) which has a single personal name. These two stones may reflect the first wave of colonization of Scotland by Gaelic speakers from Ireland during the 5th and 6th centuries.
The only other Ogham stone to have been found in this area is a fragmentary block from Lochgoilhead (LOHED/1), which has a number of unusual features not found on classic Ogham pillar stones: the stone has the remains of both an Ogham inscription and a Latin inscription (only one of two such stones in Scotland); and the Ogham inscription is engraved on an artificial stemline on the surface of the stone rather than along the edge of the stone. As the name represented by the Ogham inscription has been interpreted as being Goidelic, and there are no Pictish-style decoration on the stone, it is probably also a product of Gaelic settlers in the area, although the Latin inscription suggests a later date than the two Ogham pillar stone, perhaps the 7th or 8th century.
In addition to these three Ogham-inscribed stones, a number of Ogham inscriptions have been identified on natural rock surfaces. One, only 4 km from the Ogham stone at Poltaloch, is on a rock outcrop at the top of the hill fort at Dunadd (DUNAD/1), which has been identified as the seat of the kingdom of Dalriada. The inscription is incomplete, but part of a Gaelic name has been identified. Three other Ogham inscriptions are to be found on the walls of the Blackwaterfoot Cave on the Isle of Arran (BLFOO/1, BLFOO/2, BLFOO/3). These rock inscriptions are highly unusual, and are the only examples in Great Britain besides an unconfirmed Ogham inscription in a cave in Fife (WEMYS/1).
The majority of Scottish Ogham stones are located in areas which were under the control of Pictish kingdoms, along the eastern coast of Scotland north of the River Forth, and in the Orkney and Shetland islands. All of the stones along the east coast of Scotland are in low-lying areas on or near the coastline, with the largest concentration of stones in mainland Scotland in the area inland from Aberdeen. There are no known Ogham stones from the highlands or the Outer Hebrides, although a number of portable artefacts with Ogham inscriptions have been found in the Outer Hebrides, the Orkney islands, and the Shetland islands (marked with green tags on my map), suggesting that Ogham was more widely used than the distribution of monumental Ogham stones would suggest. These and other Ogham-inscribed portable artefacts will be discussed in a future blog post.
There are a couple of Ogham stones in the east of Scotland which are pillar-shaped and have an inscription running up one of the natural edges of the stone (AUQUH/1 and NEWT/1), but these differ from the pillar stones of Dalriada in that the inscriptions on them seem to represent Pictish personal names rather than Gaelic personal names.
The majority of Ogham inscriptions from the Pictish areas of Scotland are very different to those found in Ireland and elsewhere in Britain. Firstly, the inscriptions mostly occur on Pictish symbol stones or cross slabs where the Ogham inscription is just part of a larger design that includes Pictish symbols and images and/or intricately interlaced cross designs. Secondly, the Ogham inscription is usually engraved on an artificial stemline on the surface of the stone, either on the main surface of the stone (e.g. FRMSN/1 and BRATT/1) or running up one or both of the narrow sides of the stone (e.g. DYCE/1 and FORDN/1). In some cases the inscription does not have an artificial stemline when it runs along the sculptured edge of a monument (e.g. GOLPI/1).
The most intriguing feature of the Ogham inscriptions from the east of Scotland and the Orkney and Shetland islands is their language, which has been subject to much discussion, as well as some fanciful suggestions which I shall not repeat here. The identification of the language of these inscriptions has been hindered by the peculiar orthography employed, with frequent doubling or even trippling of letters, but the general view is that the language of these stones is mainly Pictish, and that Pictish is related to the Brythonic languages spoken in Southern Britain. Unfortunately, Pictish is so poorly attested that it is difficult to be certain what the Ogham inscriptions mean, although by analogy with Ogham stones from elsewhere it is thought that the inscriptions largely represent personal names. Although the names on these inscriptions mostly seem to be Brythonic, i.e. Pictish, several of the inscriptions include the Goidelic element MEQQ" (BREAY/1, STNIN/1) or MAQQ (ALTYR/1, DYCE/1, FRMSN/1, LARON/1) which presumably corresponds to the Primitive Irish word maqi "son of" commonly found on Ogham pillar stone from Ireland and Wales. MEQQ or MAQQ in these inscriptions may be a Gaelic loanword in Pictish, or it may indicate that at least some of these inscriptions were written in a Gaelic language, and that only the personal names were Pictish. I tend to favour the latter hypothesis as it seems unlikely that the Picts would need to borrow such a common word as "son" from their Gaelic-speaking neighbours (it has been argued unconvincingly that Pictish had no word for "son of a father" as it was a strictly matrilinear society, but in that case why would they need to use such a word in monumental inscriptions?).
There have also been some attempts to read Old Norse names and words in some of the inscriptions, particularly those from the Orkney and Shetland Islands, which were subject to Scandinavian colonization during the late 8th and early 9th centuries. The most convincing example occurs on a decorated cross slab from Bressay in Shetland (BREAY/1) which has the inscription "CRROSCC NAHHTVVDDADDS DATTRR ANN[--] | BENISES MEQQ DDROANN[--]" (The cross of Nahhtvddadds, daughter of Ann[...], and Benises, son of Droann). Katherine Forsyth regards the language of this inscription as mixed Norse-Gaelic, with the red-coloured names and words being Old Norse, and the green-coloured names and words being Goidelic. In particular, she identifies the word DATTR as Old Norse dóttir "daughter"; but although the Goidelic word inigena "daughter" only occurs a single time in the entire Ogham corpus (EGLWC/1) it seems somewhat unnecessary to have to borrow the Old Norse word for daughter when writing Ogham.
The Ogham inscriptions of the Pictish areas of Scotland (eastern coast, Orkney, and Shetland) can be divided into three types according to their epigraphic features (using the typology developed by Katherine Forsyth) :
Ogham stones in Ireland, Wales and southwest Britain are almost all Type I inscriptions, made along the edge of the stone, but in the Pictish area of Scotland only two Type I inscriptions are known. Instead, throughout eastern Scotland, the Orkney Isles and the Shetland Isles it is Type II inscriptions, made on an artificial stemline on the surface of the stone, that predominate. Outside Scotland such Type II inscriptions are exceedingly rare :
It is thought that Type IIa inscriptions are later in date than Type I inscriptions, and Type IIb inscriptions later still, and therefore that the Pictish inscriptions of Scotland are later in date than most of the Ogham stones of Ireland and elsewhere in Britain. Many of the Scottish Type II inscriptions exhibit interesting epigraphic features, and some make use of supplementary letters (forfeda) and unusual letterforms, which may reflect influence from the Ogham manuscript tradition, and further indicates that most of the Pictish Ogham inscriptions were made at a later date to the classic Ogham stones from elsewhere. The precise dating of Ogham inscriptions is uncertain, but the following approximate chronology has been suggested :
It is very hard to accurately date Ogham stones as they are normally surface features with no archaeological context, and in many cases have been moved from their original site. A very few Ogham stones have been found in association with an inhumation burial (INCHY/1, POLCH/1), and the associated burial could have provided valuable dating evidence for the dating of the Ogham inscription if systematic archaeological investigation had been carried out at the time of discovery. In recent years, two slate stones engraved with a stemline Ogham inscription have been unearthed outside of Scotland, and these could be invaluable in anchoring the date of Type II inscriptions on archaeological grounds.
In September 2006 a slate stone with a Type IIb inscription was found on the Isle of Man during an archaeological dig for the British archaeology TV programme Time Team (SANTN/2). This stone was found in association with a burial that was radiocarbon dated to AD 540–650, but as Katherine Forsyth dated the inscription to the 10th or 11th century (potentially 8th to 12th century) on epigraphic and linguistic grounds, the Time Team archaeologists discounted any association between the stone and the grave by which it was found. This was a serious error in my opinion, as the linguistic evidence was based on a misreading of the inscription, and there is not enough evidence to date an Ogham inscription on epigraphic grounds. In fact, it is precisely because the dating evidence for epigraphic features of Ogham inscription is uncertain that we need to look to archaeology for support, and throwing out archaeological dating evidence because it does not fit the preconceived dates is just wrong. The Isle of Man is far away from the Pictish areas of Scotland, and the inscription on this stone do not exhibit any of the distinctive epigraphic features of Pictish Ogham inscriptions such as angled consonants and supplementary letters, so there is no need to assume that the Isle of Man inscription dates to the same late period as many of the Pictish Ogham inscriptions.
In November 2009 a slate fragment with a Type IIa inscription was found in a ploughed field on the Penwith peninsula in Cornwall (PAUL/1), but despite being immediately reported to the Portable Antiquities Scheme and having been verified as an Ogham inscription by Professor Charles Thomas and Dr Katherine Forsyth (who has described the stone as a "really significant find"), no attempt has been made to investigate its archaeological context or find any other fragments of the inscription (the piece found had a freshly broken edge across the inscription), and it is not even included in the PAS database. Despite the shameful neglect of this important stone by archaeologists, it is an extremely important piece of evidence that stemline inscriptions were not restricted to Scotland.
From the Isle of Man and Penwith Ogham inscriptions it is possible to hypothesise that stemline Ogham inscriptions and bind Oghams developed outside of Scotland during the 6th and 7th centuries, but they are poorly represented as they were not used on monumental pillar stones, and that stemline Ogham inscriptions were introduced into the Pictish area during the 7th or 8th centuries, where they developed a number of peculiar epigraphic features not seen on Ogham inscriptions from elsewhere.
BRATT/1
Drawing by John Borland, © Crown Copyright: HES
Type IIa inscription with no unusual epigraphic features or unusual letters
BURIN/1
J. R. Allen and J. Anderson, The Early Christian Monuments of Scotland (Edinburgh, 1903) fig. 20
Type IIb inscription with various unusual epigraphic features and unusual letters : angled H- and B-series letters, letters with increasing line length, hammerhead A, X-shaped K or E, crosshatched double R
Angled Consonants
In some inscriptions the H-series and B-series of letters are made up of lines that are at an acute angle with respect to the stemline (as opposed to a right angle, as is the case with Type I inscriptions). This is more commonly a feature of Type IIb inscriptions (e.g. BURIN/1), but may also be found in some Type IIa inscriptions (e.g. BREAY/1). In the case of Type IIa inscriptions, in some cases only some letters are angled, or angling only appears to be applied to the H-series letters or the B-series letters. The direction of the angling indicates the reading direction of the inscription, with the lines trailing back towards the start of the inscription. This feature is not found in any of the Type II inscriptions from outside of the Pictish area of Scotland or in the manuscript tradition, and so it may be a local innovation. It is likely that inscriptions that exhibit this feature are later in date than inscriptions without consonant angling.
LTING/1
Drawing by Ian Gordon Scott, © HES. Ian G Scott Collection
Type IIb inscription with angled consonants, angled vowels, double dot word separator marks, hammerhead A, S-shaped A, X-shaped K or E
Angled Vowels
In some inscriptions the vowel letters are chevron-shaped rather than straight lines crossing the stemline perpendicularly. The direction of the angling indicates the reading direction of the inscription, with the lines trailing back towards the start of the inscription. This is more commonly a feature of Type IIb inscriptions (e.g. DYCE/1, LTING/1), but is rarely found on Type IIa inscriptions (e.g. a bone plaque found at Bornais in South Uist). In the Type IIb inscriptions BIRSY/3 and CBURG/1 the strokes of the vowel letters are chevron-shaped but are not bound at the tips as the other letters are. In many inscriptions angled vowel letters occur together with straight vowel letters (e.g. BREAY/1 and LTING/1), and it is not clear whether the angling is merely stylistic or whether there is a phonetic difference between angled and straight vowels.
Bornais Bone Plaque
Type IIa inscription with straight vowel (E) and angled vowel (I)
Increasing Line Length
In some inscriptions the length of the lines making up the H-series and B-series of letters increases (or less commonly decreases) in the direction of reading (e.g. ABNTY/1, BIRSY/3).
BIRSY/3
Photograph © RCAHMS
Type IIb inscription with consonant letters with increasing line length (Q) and angled vowel (I)
Double Dot Word Separator Mark
In two inscriptions found in the Shetland Islands (BREAY/1 and LTING/1), a double dot mark is used as a word separator mark. Word separator marks are not found on any other Ogham stone inscriptions from Scotland or elsewhere. The double-dot mark is identical to the Runic double-dot word separator mark (᛬) used in Old Norse Runic inscriptions such as the mixed Ogham and Runic inscriptions on the Isle of Man (e.g. MAUGH/2), and the use of the double dot mark in the Shetland inscriptions is a reflection of Scandinavian colonization of the islands during the late 8th and early 9th centuries.
Hammerhead A
This is a relatively common variant form of the letter A, written as a single stroke crossing and perpendicular to the stemline, with a short horizontal line at the end of the bottom end (i.e. on the same side as the strokes of the B-series of letters). This letter is found in both Type IIa inscriptions (e.g. LARON/1) and Type IIb inscriptions (e.g. DYCE/1, LTING/1). It is uncertain whether this letter represents a special phonetic value or whether it is a stylistic variant intended to make the letter more distinctive
DYCE/1
Drawing by John Borland, © Crown Copyright: HES
Type IIb inscription with hammerhead A (three examples), S-shaped A, and rabbit-eared double D (upside down at the right end of the inscription)
S-shaped A
This is a rare variant of the letter A, written as a single curved ʃ-shaped stroke crossing the stemline. This letter is found in both Type IIa inscriptions (e.g. LARON/1) and Type IIb inscriptions (e.g. DYCE/1, LTING/1). In the Auraicept na n-Éces similar ʃ-shaped strokes are used for the M-series of letters, but from context it is clear that the ʃ-shaped stroke in these inscriptions must be a vowel, and as in two out of three cases (LARON/1 and DYCE/1) the letter occurs between M and QQ, it would seem to be used to represent the a of maqq "son". However, it is uncertain whether this letter represents a special phonetic value or whether it is simply a stylistic variant intended to make the letter more distinctive.
Auraicept na n-Éces
Book of Ballymote folio 169v : M-series letters written with S-shaped strokes
Rabbit-eared D
This is a very rare variant of the letter D, written with the two strokes curving away in opposite directions like a pair of rabbit ears. The letter is only attested in the Type IIa inscription BREAY/1 where a pair of rabbit-eared Ds are used contrastively with a pair of ordinary Ds.
BREAY/1 (right side)
Drawing by Ian Gordon Scott, © HES. Ian G Scott Collection
Type IIa inscription with double dot word separator marks, rabbit-eared D (pair of) and angled vowel (A)
In the Type IIb inscription DYCE/1 a pair of Ds is written with each letter curving away from the other letter so that both letters together look like a single pair of rabbit ears (this contrasts with a pair of parallel Ds elsewhere in the same inscription). As the two strokes of a single letter D could not curve away from each other when written as bind Oghams, it is quite likely that the rabbit-eared double D of DYCE/1 is the bind Ogham equivalent of the pair of rabbit-eared Ds of BREAY/1.
It has been conjectured by Forsyth and others that the rabbit-eared D (or pair of such letters) represents a voiced dental fricative [ð], in contrast with the [d] of the standard letter D (or pair of such letters).
Crosshatched Double R
Two inscriptions, one in Orkney (BURIN/1) and one in Shetland (BREAY/1), have an unusual letter made up of five diagonal strokes in one direction overlaid by five diagonal strokes in the other direction. This crosshatched letterform does occur in the Auraicept na n-Éces, but only as part of a stylistic variant of the Ogham alphabet created by writing each letter with double overlaid strokes. The crosshatched letter that occurs in inscriptions is thought to represent a double R, but whether it has a different phonetic value than an ordinary sequential double R is not known.
Auraicept na n-Éces
Book of Ballymote folio 170r : "Interwoven thread Ogham"
Diagonal I
In BREAY/1 there occurs a unique letter made of five backwards slanting diagonal slopes (i.e. slanting in the opposite direction to an Ogham letter R). From its context it is thought to represent a letter I.
BREAY/1 (left side)
Drawing by Ian Gordon Scott, © HES. Ian G Scott Collection
Type IIa inscription with double dot word separator marks, diagonal I, crosshatched double R, and diamond O
Diamond O
A diamond-shaped letter O occurs in two Scottish Ogham inscriptions (FRMSN/1 and BREAY/1), and in only a single inscription outside Scotland (KLGRO/1). This is the same as the supplementary letter Ór ᚖ that is found in the manuscript tradition to represent the diphthong oi (see detail from Book of Ballymote folio 169v shown above). It is not certain what phonetic difference compared with the ordinary letter O this letter represents.
X-shaped Letter K or E
An X-shaped letter is quite common in Scottish Ogham inscriptions. This is the same as the supplementary letter Éabhadh ᚕ that is found in the manuscript tradition to represent the diphthong ea (see detail from Book of Ballymote folio 169v shown above). However, in the inscriptional tradition it is used to represent either the consonant K or the vowel E. As a consonant it is almost exclusively used in the deictic particle koi ᚕᚑᚔ (which corresponds semantically to the Latin phrase hic iacit "here lies"), which is found nine times in Irish Ogham inscriptions (BUKIL/1, COLIN/4, LEGAN/1, BALBO/1, DNARD/1, BAHAN/2, MONAT/3, BLTAG/2, BLTAG/9). It may rarely be found as a consonant in other words, as in COOLM/1 (County Kerry, Ireland), where it is used to spell the clan name TOICAKI ᚈᚑᚔᚉᚐᚕᚔ, which contrasts with COOLM/2 and COOLM/4 where the same name is spelled TOICACI ᚈᚑᚔᚉᚐᚉᚔ.
In a number of other Irish Ogham inscriptions (COOGH/1, COOLH/1, CLCAH/1, COOLM/5, KLGRO/1, KMKDR/3, LETWE/1, PRKLA/1, TINAH/2) the X-shaped letter is taken to correspond the vowel E (because, for example, it occurs between two consonants where K would not be expected), although the exact phonetic difference between the ordinary letter E and the X-shaped letter E is unknown. These inscriptions have linguistic features that are indicative of a relatively late date, such as the use of the formulaic word ANM "name" in six of them, which suggests that the vocalic use of the X-shaped letter is a later development in the history of the Ogham script, and that inscriptions with a vocalic X (E) postdate this with a consonantal X (K).
In the Scottish Ogham inscriptions the X-shaped letter is found on BURIN/1, DYCE/1, FRMSN/1, GOLPI/1, LTING/1, MAINS/1, NEWT/1, as well as on the Bornais Bone Plaque. In four of these inscriptions (GOLPI/1, FRMSN/1, LTING/1, MAINS/1), from context it is clear that the letter acts as a vowel. In the case of DYCE/1 the X-shaped letter occurs before a letter O, so could be an E or a K, but as DYCE/1 is epigraphically similar to LTING/1 it is more likely to be intended as an E. In the case of the NETW/1 inscription, which has features indicative of an earlier date than the other Pictish Ogham inscriptions (the inscription is carved along the edge of a stone pilar, with no artificial stemline), the X-shaped letter occurs between two vowel letters, and so is unlikely to be a vowel as well, but has been interpreted as either a K in Goidelic koi "here" or a P in Pictish ipo = ipe "nephew" (the letter P ᚘ is written as an X below the stemline in Ogham inscriptions).
BURIN/1 is the most problematic inscription, as it has two occurences of the letter: one shaped like an X, which has been interpretted as a K or P because it occurs immediately in front of an ordinary letter E; and one shaped like > <, which has been interpretted as an E in the word CERROCCS "cross" (as a borrowing from Latin crux), although the 'E' is unexpected here, and on other inscriptions the word is spelt "CRROSCC" (BREAY/1) or "CROSQC". As BURIN/1 has features indicative of a late date (artificial stemline, bind letters, hammerhead A, crosshatched double R), it seems likely that the X-shaped letter would act as a vowel rather than a consonant, and as the two X-shaped letters in this inscription are written differently, I think that the X-shaped letter is intended to be the letter P, and the > <-shaped letter is intended to be the letter É. A disjoined X-shaped letter (either shaped like ") (" or "> <") representing É is also found on the Irish inscription CLCAH/1 and on the Scottish inscription LTING/1, so it may be that the original X-shaped letter É evolved into a disjoined > < shape in order to distinguish it from the letter P which in later inscriptions came to be written as an X on the stemline rather than below the stemline.
X-shaped Letter P
The supplementary letter Ifín ᚘ that is found in the manuscript tradition to represent the diphthong io (see detail from Book of Ballymote folio 169v shown above) earlier represented the letter P (not used in Old Irish), and is found in a few Ogham inscriptions as an X-shaped letter written below the stemline to represent P in Latin and Pictish words (COOLE/1 and WHFLD/2 in Ireland; CRCKH/1 and KENFG/1 in Wales; PAUL/1 in Cornwall).
There are two Scottish inscriptions that may use the X-shaped letter P, NEWT/1 and BURIN/1, but, as discussed above, in both cases it is not certain whether the letter in question represents a P or a K/É.
Semicircular Letter
The LTING/1 inscription includes an unidentified letter written as a semicircle below the stemline. There is a small semicircle line faintly engraved inside the semicircle, but Forsyth suggests this may be an "initial guide-stroke lightly incised" rather than part of the letter. As the letter occurs between two consonants it has been taken to represent a vowel, but it is not clear what vowel it should represent. It is possible that it is the epigraphic equivalent of the supplementary letter Uilleann ᚗ that is found in the manuscript tradition to represent the diphthong ui (see detail from Book of Ballymote folio 169v shown above).
Letter H
The letter uath ᚆ, which corresponds to H in the manuscript tradition, is not normally found in Ogham inscriptions outside Scotland, as it appears not to have been needed for writing Primitive Irish (or even Latin, as indicated by the SDOGW/1 inscription in Wales, where the Latin name HOGTIVIS is written in the Ogham script as OGTEN[AS]). However, this letter is very common in Scottish inscriptions from the Pictish area, occuring in 12 or 13 words in eight or nine inscriptions, usually written singly at the start or end of a word, and doubled as HH ᚆᚆ in the middle of words :
The letter most frequently occurs before the letter T, particularly in words that appear to be forms of the common Pictish name Nechtan. It is likely that the letter H in Pictish inscriptions represents a voiceless palatal fricative [ç] or a voiceless velar fricative [x].
The following table summarises the various unusual Ogham letters found in Pictish Ogham inscriptions, and how they are represented in Unicode on this page. Some of them may be candidates for encoding in Unicode or for defining as Unicode Standardized Variants.
Glyph Image |
Ogham Text |
Description | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
ᚐ | Hammerhead A | Treated as a glyph variant of U+1690, and displayed on this page using the BabelStone Ogham Pictish Bold font*. | |
ᚐ | S-Shaped A | Treated as a glyph variant of U+1690, and displayed on this page using the BabelStone Ogham Special font*. | |
ᚐ | Angled A | Treated as glyph variants of U+1690 through U+1694, and displayed on this page using the BabelStone Ogham Pictish Italic font*. | |
ᚑ | Angled O | ||
ᚒ | Angled U | ||
ᚓ | Angled E | ||
ᚔ | Angled I | ||
ᚔ | Diagonal I | Treated as a glyph variant of U+1694, and displayed on this page using the BabelStone Ogham Special font*. | |
ᚇ | Rabbit-eared D | Treated as a glyph variant of U+1687, and displayed on this page using the BabelStone Ogham Special font*. | |
ᚕ | Disjoined X | Treated as a glyph variant of U+1695, and displayed on this page using the BabelStone Ogham Special font*. | |
ᚗ | Semicircular U | Treated as a glyph variant of U+1697, and displayed on this page using the BabelStone Ogham Special font*. | |
ᚘ | X-shaped P | Treated as a glyph variant of U+1698, and displayed on this page using the BabelStone Ogham Pictish font*. | |
ᚏᚏ | Crosshatched Double R | Treated as a ligature of U+168F and U+168F, and displayed on this page using the BabelStone Ogham Pictish font*. | |
᛬ | Double Dot Punctuation | Treated as the Runic multiple punctuation mark (U+16EC), which has the script property of 'common', and displayed on this page using the BabelStone Ogham Pictish font*. |
* The 12 BabelStone Ogham fonts provide a variety of different styles of Ogham lettering (stemline and stemless, bound and unbound, straight strokes and angled strokes), and web font (WOFF) versions should be automatically downloaded and applied to this page. If you want to install these fonts on your local system they may be downloaded for free here. NB The Crosshatched Double R ligature may not display correctly on some browsers, and even on those browsers that do support it, it may only be displayed correctly if the BabelStone Ogham Pictish font is installed on your computer (i.e. not using the automatically downloaded web font).
[The Ogham stones of Scotland are grouped according to the 32 council areas into which Scotland has been divided since 1996, ordered geographically from southwest to northeast.]
Site | Lochnaw, Leswalt, Wigtownshire, Dumfries and Galloway |
NGR | NW 9900 6200 |
Current Location | Dumfries Museum (DUMFM:0201.71) |
History | Said to have been found during ploughing at Lochnaw in the 1960s or 1970s. At some later date it was donated to the Observatory Museum in Dumfries. |
Description | Irregular pillar stone with an Ogham inscription on an artificial stemline running up one side. |
Dimensions | 0.54 × 0.39 × 0.41 m. |
Date | |
Notes | Forsyth is unable to make any sense of the supposed Ogham inscription, and it may be a forgery, especially as no other Ogham inscriptions have been found in Scotland south of the Forth-Clyde line. |
References |
CISP LONAW/1 Canmore Canmore 60396 |
Photograph © Dumfries & Galloway Council |
Site | King's Cave, Blackwaterfoot, Kilmory. Arran, North Ayrshire |
NGR | NR 8800 3000 |
Current Location | In situ, on the left-hand wall of the cave, about 9 m from the entrance. |
History | Ogham inscription first recognised in about 1968. |
Description | Inscription engraved on a vertically oriented fissure on the cave wall. |
Dimensions | |
Date | 500–799 (Forsyth) |
Notes | The inscription is probably incomplete at both ends, and the surviving letters MEQ probably correspond to Old Irish MAQI "son of". |
References |
CISP BLFOO/1 Canmore Canmore 39229 |
Canmore SC 408046, © RCAHMS |
Ogham Text | ᚋᚓᚊ (bottom-to-top) |
Transcription | [--]MEQ[--] |
Reading | [--] MEQ[I] [--] |
Translation | ... son of ... |
Site | King's Cave, Blackwaterfoot, Kilmory. Arran, North Ayrshire |
NGR | NR 8800 3000 |
Current Location | In situ, on the left-hand wall of the cave, about 11 m from the entrance. |
History | Ogham inscription first recognised in 1992. |
Description | Inscription engraved on a vertically oriented artificial stemline on the cave wall. |
Dimensions | 30 cm |
Date | 500–799 (Forsyth) |
Notes | Forsyth reads the inscription as a Brythonic personal name, Vuedla. |
References |
CISP BLFOO/2 Canmore Canmore 39229 |
Canmore SC 408047, © Crown Copyright: HES |
Ogham Text | ᚃᚒᚓᚇᚂᚐ (bottom-to-top) |
Transcription | [F]UEDLA |
Reading | VUEDLA |
Translation | Vuedla |
Site | King's Cave, Blackwaterfoot, Kilmory. Arran, North Ayrshire |
NGR | NR 8800 3000 |
Current Location | In situ, on the left-hand wall of the cave, left of BLFOO/1. |
History | Ogham inscription first recognised in 2001. |
Description | Inscription engraved on a vertically oriented fissure on the cave wall. |
Dimensions | |
Date | |
Notes | The inscription comprises a few Ogham letter strokes across a natural fissure, but no definite reading can be made out. |
References | CISP BLFOO/3 |
Site | Dunadd, Kilmichael Glassary, Argyll and Bute |
NGR | NR 8365 9356 |
Current Location | In situ. |
History | Ogham inscription recognised in 1953. In 1978 the carved part of the rock ledge was covered by a protective fibreglass facsimile of the rock surface. |
Description | Natural rock outcrop forming a ledge near the summit of the Dunadd Hill Fort on which are various carvings, including several footprints and a boar. Two Ogham inscriptions are carved next to two parallel fissures on the north side of the rock ledge. |
Dimensions | |
Date | 700–833 (Forsyth) |
Notes | Dunadd was an Iron Age hillfort, and later the seat of the Gaelic kingdom of Dalriada. The Ogham inscription has no natural or artificial stemline and is badly weathered, so cannot be easily read. Jackson regards the language of the inscription as Pictish, whereas Forsyth regards it as Gaelic, and recognises the Gaelic name "Finn". |
References |
CISP DUNAD/1 Canmore Canmore 212008 |
Canmore SC 450685, © RCAHMS |
Ogham Text | |
Transcription | HCSD[-]T[--]V[-]NH[-]TLV | L[ -[--]VQRRHMDNHQI (Jackson) |
[AE]S[D^O][I^Q][--]V[N]A[D^O][--][T^C][-] | VI[NN]M[A]NA[CH] (Forsyth) | |
Reading | |
Translation |
Site | Cnoc na Carraigh, Gigha and Cara, Isle of Gigha, Argyll and Bute |
NGR | NR 6426 4817 |
Current Location | In situ, 90 m northwest of Kilchattan church. |
History | Known since the 17th century; knocked down and top section lost in 1845; knocked down again in about 1864, and re-erected at current location, close to its original site. The Ogham inscription was first recognised in 1899. |
Description | Four-sided pillar stone with an Ogham inscription running up one edge. |
Dimensions | 1.70 × 0.25 × 0.31 m. |
Date | 400–599 (Forsyth) 600 (Jackson) |
Notes | This is a classic Ogham stone, with the typical "X, son of Y" inscription engraved down the stone's edge in classic style Ogham letters (no stemline, dot vowels). However, the inscription is weathered, as well as being damaged in four places, which makes it very hard to read. |
References |
CISP GIGHA/1 Macalister 1945 #506 |
Photograph by Steve Partridge, 1 June 2006, CC BY-SA 2.0 |
Canmore SC 413608, © RCAHMS |
Ogham Text | ᚃᚔᚊᚒᚂᚐᚋᚐᚊᚔᚉᚑᚋᚌᚔᚅᚔ (left edge, bottom-to-top) |
Transcription | FI[C!][ULA]MAQ[U!][T!]O[M]GI[L!][I] |
Reading | VICULA MAQ CUGINI (Macalister) |
VIQULA MAQI COMGINI (Forsyth) | |
Translation | Viqula, son of Comginus |
Site | Inchmarnock, Argyll and Bute |
NGR | NS 0240 5962 |
Current Location | |
History | Found in the metal-working area near the ruins of the 12th-century church, during excavations in 2000–2004. |
Description | Small, irregular-shaped slate slab with two lines Latin text on one side, and a cross design and a line of Ogham text on the other side. |
Dimensions | circa 0.07 × 0.03 m. |
Date | 750 (Lowe) |
Notes | The Latin inscription, adeptus sanctum praemium ("having reached the holy reward"), is a line of verse from a hymn recorded in the Antiphonary of Bangor. The Ogham inscription is the first ten letters of the Ogham alphabet. This is not a memorial stone, but was probably used for writing practice by novices at the monastic school. |
References |
Past Horizons (23 September 2011) Lowe, C. E. (ed.). Inchmarnock: an Early Historic Island Monastery and its archaeological landscape. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 2008. |
The 'adeptus stone' side A (Latin inscription), © Headland Archaeology Ltd |
The 'adeptus stone' side B (Ogham inscription and cross design), © Headland Archaeology Ltd |
Transcription | |
Reading | adeptus sanctum praemium |
Translation | Having reached the holy reward |
Ogham Text | ᚁᚂᚃᚄᚅᚆᚇᚈᚉᚊ |
Transcription | BLFSNHDTCQ |
Reading | BLFSN HDTCQ |
Translation | b, l, f, s, n; h, d, t, c, q; ... |
Notes | The first ten letters of the Ogham alphabet, carved on an artificial stemline. |
Site | Lochgoilhead, Lochgoilhead and Kilmorich, Argyll and Bute |
NGR | NN 1985 0146 |
Current Location | Inside Lochgoilhead And Kilmorich parish church. |
History | Discovered inside the parish church in 1990; previous history unknown. |
Description | Rectangular sandstone block with a Latin inscription in two lines parallel to the edge on one side, and a Latin inscription in one line and an Ogham inscription on an artificial stemline, both running parallel to the edge, on the other side. |
Dimensions | 0.42 × 0.16 × 0.11 m. |
Date | 600–799 (Forsyth) |
Notes | The Latin inscription on one side consists of the remnants of the first 13 letters of the alphabet. The Latin inscription on the other side is illegible. The Ogham inscription cannot be read with confidence, but Forsyth suggests it may represent the Irish personal name Mod-Magli or Mu-Dali. |
References |
CISP LOHED/1 Canmore Canmore 318854 |
Canmore SC 414895, © Crown Copyright: HES |
Transcription | [-] B [-] D E F | H [I] K L M N |
Reading | A B C D E F G H I K L M N |
Translation |
Ogham Text | ᚆᚋᚒᚇ ᚐᚂᚔ |
Transcription | [H?]MUD[?]ALI[?] |
Reading | |
Translation |
Site | Brough an Drummin (Kill y Kiaran), Poltaloch, Kilmartin, Argyll and Bute |
NGR | NR 8200 9710 |
Current Location | National Museum of Scotland [HPO 470]. |
History | Discovered in 1931 near to four long-cist burials that had been excavated in 1928; it is assumed to have broken off one of the cist stones during excavation. |
Description | Fragment of a sandstone pillar stone, with an Ogham inscription along one edge. |
Dimensions | 2.54 × 0.82 × 0.57 m. |
Date | |
Notes | |
References |
CISP POLCH/1 Canmore Canmore 39479 Macalister 1945 #507 |
Canmore SC 414896, © Crown Copyright: HES |
Ogham Text | ᚉᚏᚑᚅᚐᚅ (bottom-to-top) |
Transcription | CRON[AN] |
Reading | CRONAN |
Translation | Cronan |
Site | Scoonie, Fife |
NGR | NO 3840 0167 |
Current Location | National Museum of Scotland [IB 110]. |
History | Found in the old churchyard at Scoonie in the early or mid 19th century; moved to the church at Leven. Donated to the National Museum of Antiquities of Scotland in 1866. |
Description | Sandstone cross slab, with a very worn cross on the front and a Pictish-style elephant and hunting scene on the back. An Ogham inscription on an artificial stemline in engraved on the back, parallel to the right edge. The stemline of the Ogham inscription is interrupted by the feet and head of one of the stags (leaving a gap before the final letter), indicating that the Ogham was engraved after the hunting scene was engraved. The top and bottom of the stone are missing. |
Dimensions | 1.06 × 0.7 × 0.1 m. |
Date | |
Notes | The Ogham inscription represents a Brythonic personal name. |
References |
CISP SCNIE/1 Canmore Canmore 31328 |
J. R. Allen and J. Anderson, The Early Christian Monuments of Scotland (Edinburgh, 1903) fig. 360 |
Ogham Text | ᚓᚇᚇᚐᚏᚏᚅᚑᚅ ᚅ (bottom-to-top) |
Transcription | EDDARRNONN |
Reading | EDDARRNONN |
Translation | Eddarrnonn |
Site | Jonathan's Cave, Wemyss Caves, East Wemyss, Fife |
NGR | NT 3391 9699 |
Current Location | In situ, carved into the upper ledges at the back of the cave. |
History | |
Description | Horizontal Ogham inscription on the wall of a cave. |
Dimensions | |
Date | |
Notes | This inscription does not seem to have been examined by experts yet, and as the inscription is not clear on the available photographs it is not possible to confirm whether this is a genuine Ogham inscription or not. |
References | Canmore Canmore 53979 |
Site | Old Kilmadock graveyard, Doune, Stirling |
NGR | NN 7066 0247 |
Current Location | |
History | The stone was previously known, but the Ogham inscription along the bottom edge was only discovered during archaeological excavation at Old Kilmadock graveyard in September 2022. |
Description | Grave slab with engraved pattern on one surface, and an Ogham inscription along one edge of the other surface. The use of the natural edge of the slab as the stemline for the Ogham inscription is unusual in Scotland, where Pictish Ogham inscriptions are usually inscribed on an artificial stemline on the surface of the face or side of the stone. This suggests that the stone may not represent the Pictish tradition, but may belong to the Gaelic kingdom of Dalriada. |
Dimensions | |
Date | |
Notes | More information on the Ogham inscription will be added when available. |
References | Canmore Canmore 2156697 |
Dr Murray Cook on Twitter (17 September 2022) |
Dr Murray Cook on Twitter (17 September 2022) |
Ross Cameron on Twitter (17 September 2022) |
Ogham Text | |
Transcription | |
Reading | |
Translation |
Site | Abernethy, Perth and Kinross |
NGR | NO 1900 1641 |
Current Location | National Museum of Scotland [IB 98] |
History | Discovered in 1890 in the old churchyard. Donated to the National Museum of Antiquities of Scotland in 1892. |
Description | Fragment of a sandstone slab, with two horse legs above a raised band within which an Ogham inscription on an artificial stemline is engraved. |
Dimensions | 0.36 × 0.23 × 0.07 m. |
Date | |
Notes | Ogham inscription is written with bind oghams. |
References |
CISP ABNTY/1 Canmore Canmore 27926 |
J. R. Allen and J. Anderson, The Early Christian Monuments of Scotland (Edinburgh, 1903) fig. 323 |
Ogham Text | ᚊᚋᚔ |
Transcription | [--]QMI[--] |
Reading | [--]QMI[--] |
Translation |
Site | Abernethy, Perth and Kinross |
NGR | NO 1900 1640 |
Current Location | Unknown. |
History | Discovered 29 January 1895 in the old churchyard, north of the foundation wall of the Church, about 1.4 m below the surface amongst the foundations of the old church, by the sexton when digging a grave. The discovery was witnessed by Mr. Marr, who was the discoverer of ABNTY/1 in 1890. |
Description | Slab with Pictish symbols (including a crown and a bird) and an Ogham inscription engraved on an artificial stemline on the surface. |
Dimensions | 0.48 × 0.33 × 0.10 m. |
Date | |
Notes |
The discovery of the stone was reported in The Scotsman (30 January 1895) by the Rev. Dugald Butler, and the stone sent to the Museum of Antiquities in Edinburgh for examination. The Earl of Southesk wrote an article discussing the find in April 1895.[1] He points out the following suspicious features: the Ogham stemline is straight as a rule; the Ogham letters are mostly vowels, and make no sense; the Ogham letters include semicircular forms not found in other Ogham inscriptions; the symbols do not resemble the designs on other Pictish symbol stones; some of the lines are only lightly scratched on the surface of the stone, and are white as if newly made; and there is moss growing on the edge of the stone. He suggests that the stone is most likely to be a modern forgery, but he does not discount the possibility that it was a medieval production, influenced by manuscript Ogham, that was found and discarded when the old church was demolished in 1801. [1] Earl of Southesk, "An ogam inscription at Abernethy, 1895"; Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland vol. 29 (1895) pp. 244–251. |
References | Canmore Canmore 27998 |
Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland vol. 29 (1895) p. 249 |
Site | Dupplin, Forteviot, Perth and Kinross |
NGR | NO 0505 1897 |
Current Location | Tower of St. Serf's Church, Dunning, Perth and Kinross (NO 0190 1449) |
History | The cross was first recorded in 1769. The cross originally stood 750 m southwest of Dupplin Castle, but in 1998 it was moved to the National Museum of Scotland in Edinburgh, and in 2002 it was moved to St. Serf's Church in Dunning. |
Description | Sandstone cross, intricately decorated throughout, with a Latin inscription on the top of the shaft on the west face. |
Dimensions | 2.62 × 0.94 × 0.33 m. |
Date | 789‑820 (Forsyth) |
Notes |
Forsyth has suggested that there are Ogham inscriptions on the rectangular base into which the cross is inserted, but she has not provided any readings for them.[1] Lane and Campbell note that Forsyth's "identification is more doubtful now that the cross is in a museum setting and the base is fully visible".[2] [1] Katherine Forsyth, "The Inscriptions on the Duplin Cross"; in C. Bourke (ed.), From the Isles of the North: Medieval Art in Ireland and Britain (Belfast, 1995) pages 237–244. [2] Alan Lane and Ewan Campbell, Dunadd: An early Dalriadic capital (Oxford, 2000) page 267. |
References |
CISP DUPLN/1 Canmore Canmore 26594 |
Photograph by Patricia Steel, 24 April 2007, CC BY-SA 2.0 |
Transcription | CUST[A^E]NTIN | FILIUSFIRCU | S[-]U[--] | [--] | [--] | [--]AM | [--][CD]EFG |
Reading | CUSTANTIN FILIUS FIRCUS [-]U[--]AM[...][CD]EFG |
Translation | Caustantín, son of Fergus |
Site | Inchyra House, St. Madoes, Perth and Kinross |
NGR | NO 1094 2120 |
Current Location | Perth Museum and Art Gallery (PMAG 5/1945) |
History | Found in 1945 whilst ploughing 100 m south of Inchyra House, in the Carse of Gowrie. Donated to Perth Museum in 1945. |
Description | Rectangular sandstone slab with Pictish symbols carved on both faces. There are four Ogham inscriptions on one face and one end. |
Dimensions | 1.6 × 0.31 × 0.43 m. |
Date | |
Notes | The stone slab was found covering a grave. There is one main Ogham inscription (A), clearly engraved on an artificial stemline that starts half way along one of the long sides and bends around the short end. Additionally, there are two lightly scratched Ogham inscriptions on either long side (B and C), which are harder to read, and one short Ogham inscription (D) of a few letters with no stemline on the wide end of the "rough" side. None of the inscriptions have been interpreted, and it has been suggested that the two lightly scratched inscriptions may be trial inscriptions or even graffiti. The start of the main inscription, "INEHHETES", is reminiscent of "NEHTETRI" of ACKGL/1, "NEHHTV" of FRMSN/1, and "NEHHTON[N]" of LTING/1, and may represent a Pictish name. |
References |
CISP INCHY/1 Canmore Canmore 28250 |
Canmore SC 397216 Drawing © Crown Copyright: HES |
Ogham Text | ᚔᚅᚓᚆᚆᚓᚈᚓᚄᚉᚔᚓᚈᚈᚔᚅᚅᚓ (left side, bottom-to-top, running round the top side) |
Transcription | INEHHETES[C]IE[T!][T!]INNE |
Reading | INEHHETES[C]IE[T][T]INNE |
Translation |
Ogham Text | (left edge, top-to-bottom) |
Transcription | [E!]TTL[I!]ETR[E!]N[?]I[DD]OR[SV] |
Reading | ETTLIETRENOIDDORS |
Translation |
Ogham Text | (right edge, top-to-bottom) |
Transcription | [--][U!]HT[U][O!][A!]GED[--] |
Reading | |
Translation |
Ogham Text | ᚄᚓᚈᚒ (bottom of back face, reading down) |
Transcription | [S!]ET[U][--] |
Reading | SET[U][--] |
Translation |
Site | Nether Auquhollie Farm, Fetteresso, Aberdeenshire |
NGR | NO 8232 9079 |
Current Location | In situ, by the side of a path 380 m. northwest of Nether Auquhollie farmhouse.. |
History | Purportedly part of a stone circle near a croft called "Langstanes" that was cleared circa 1865 (but no sign of the stone circle remains). The Ogham inscription was first recognised in 1886. |
Description | Pillar stone with a rectangular Pictish symbol on the northeast side, and an Ogham inscription along the southeast edge. |
Dimensions | 0.43 × 0.66 × 0.7 m. |
Date | 400–700 (Forsyth) |
Notes | The Ogham inscription probably represents two personal names. The stone was subject to high resolution scanning by Archaeoptics in 2005 (?). |
References |
CISP AUQUH/1 Canmore Canmore 37143 |
Canmore SC 676525 Photograph by James Ritchie, June 1917 |
Canmore SC 1110649 Drawing by John Borland, © Crown Copyright: HES |
Ogham Text | ᚃᚒᚒᚅᚑᚅᚔᚓᚈᚓᚇᚑᚃᚑᚅᚔ (bottom-to-top) |
Transcription | FUUNON[IE]TEDOFO[N^R]I |
Reading | VUUNONI ETEDOVONI |
Translation |
Site | Brandsbutt, Inverurie, Aberdeenshire |
NGR | NJ 7599 2240 |
Current Location | In Situ. |
History | First recognised as an engraved stone in 1891; at some time it was broken up for use in a field dyke, but was later put back together. |
Description | Pictish symbol stone with an Ogham inscription on an artificial stemline running parallel to the left edge of the stone. |
Dimensions | 1.07 × 1.27 × 0.91 m. |
Date | |
Notes | |
References |
CISP BRATT/1 Canmore Canmore 18894 |
Photograph by Otter, 2 May 2008, CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Canmore SC 1080173 Drawing by John Borland, © Crown Copyright: HES |
Ogham Text | ᚔᚏᚐᚈᚐᚇᚇᚑᚐᚏᚓᚅᚄ |
Transcription | IRATADDOARENS[--] |
Reading | |
Translation |
Site | Chapel of St. Fergus, Dyce, Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire |
NGR | NJ 8752 1541 |
Current Location | West end of the chapel. |
History | Originally built into the wall of the churchyard; then moved to the inside of the church, where it was set into the wall. The Ogham inscription on the side of the stone was only identified after it had been removed from the wall for conservation some time between 1996 and 2004. |
Description | Cross slab with Pictish symbols on the front and an Ogham inscription on an artificial stemline, running up the right side of the stone, then bending round and running down to the left. |
Dimensions | 1.40 × 0.60 m. |
Date | 833–866. |
Notes | Ogham inscription is written with bind oghams, and comprises probably two personal names followed by maqq "son of" and the Gaelic name Rodad. |
References | Canmore Canmore 19466 |
Photograph by Otter, 20 May 2011, CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Canmore SC 1080221 Drawing by John Borland, © Crown Copyright: HES |
Ogham Text | ᚕᚑᚈᚈᚐᚄᚄᚐᚏᚏᚆᚓᚈᚑᚇᚇᚓᚇᚇᚑᚈᚄᚋᚐᚊᚊᚏᚑᚑᚑᚇᚇᚐᚇᚇ (bottom-to-top then top-to-bottom) |
Transcription | XOTT{A}SS{A}RRHETODDEDDOTSM{A}QQROOODD{A}{DD} |
Reading | ÉOTTASSARRH ETODDEDDOTS MAQQ ROOODDADD |
Translation |
Site | St. Palladius's Chapel, Auchenblae, Fordoun, Aberdeenshire |
NGR | NO 7261 7841 |
Current Location | In the vestibule of Fordoun parish church. |
History | Found at the base of the pulpit when rebuilding the church in 1788; moved to the adjacent Chapel of St. Palladius; moved to the vestibule of the church in 1966. |
Description | Sandstone cross slab engraved with horsemen and dogs on the front face, a Latin inscription on the top left of the front face, and Ogham inscriptions on artificial stemlines running up both sides. |
Dimensions | 1.58 × 0.88 × 0.75 m. |
Date | 700–799 (Jackson) |
Notes | Rhys and Macalister both noted an Ogham inscription on the left side of the slab, but other authors (Allen & Anderson, Okasha, Forsyth) were unable to see any Ogham inscription on the stone. However, high resolution scanning of the stone by Archaeoptics in 2005 (?) seems to have confirmed the presence of Ogham inscriptions on both sides of the stone. |
References |
CISP FORDN/1 Canmore Canmore 36458 |
Canmore SC 1081380 Drawing by John Borland, © Crown Copyright: HES |
Transcription | [--] | PIDARNOIN |
Reading | [--] PIDARNOIN |
Translation |
Ogham Text | |
Transcription | |
Reading | |
Translation |
Site | St. Adamnan's Church, Formaston, Aboyne, Aberdeenshire |
NGR | NJ 5412 0014 |
Current Location | Victory Hall, Aboyne. |
History | Found under the doorstep of the old church at Formaston some time prior to 1874; moved to Aboyne Castle by 1883; moved to Carnegie Library in Inverurie in 1974; moved to Victory Hall, Aboyne in 2002. |
Description | Lower right fragment of a granite cross slab. Two Ogham stemlines are engraved parallel to the right edge, both reading bottom-to-top. |
Dimensions | 1.12 × 0.44 × 0.12 m. |
Date | 775–1000 (Forsyth) |
Notes | Forsyth dates the cross slab to around the late 8th or early 9th century, but the Ogham inscription was probably engraved onto the slab at a later date. The language of the inscription is Old Irish, but the two personal names, Nehht and Talorg, are Pictish. The inscription refers to the village of Kineff, which lies about 40 km southwest of Aboyne. The word robbac that precedes Kineff has been taken[1] as a form of the Old Irish word robaith (literally 'quench', 'drown', 'submerge'[2]) that occurs in the Book of Deer as legal term of uncertain meaning relating to grants of land over a period of time (cf. robith, "a period of usucaption, apparently covering the lifetime (or possession) of ten owners" in the Dictionary of the Irish Language). On this basis, Forsyth suggests that the inscription may record the transfer of land at Kineff to the church at Formaston. Forsyth suggests that the final 'c' in the word "robbac" may have been a misreading of an insular letter t (ꞇ) in a manuscript model for the inscription text, but as Ogham 'c' (ᚉ) is just one stroke more than 't' (ᚈ) it could more likely have been a simple carving error. [1] William F. Skene, Celtic Scotland: A History of Ancient Alban (Edinburgh, 1876) vol.1 p.211. [2] Kenneth H. Jackson, The Gaelic Notes in the Book of Deer (Cambridge University Press, 1972) p.120. |
References |
CISP FRMSN/1 Canmore Canmore 17507 |
Canmore SC 676521 Photograph by James Ritchie of the stone at Aboyne Castle, July 1902 |
Canmore SC 1092658 Drawing by John Borland, © RCAHMS |
Ogham Text | ᚋᚐᚊᚊᚖᚈᚐᚂᚂᚒᚑᚏᚏ ᚆ (left stemline, bottom-to-top) |
ᚅᚕᚆᚆᚈᚃᚏᚑᚁᚁᚐᚉᚉᚕᚅᚅᚓᚃᚃ (right stemline, bottom-to-top) | |
Transcription | MAQQÓTALLUORRH | NXHHTFROBBACCXNNEFF |
Reading | MAQQO TALLUORRH | NÉHHTF ROBB{A}T CÉNNEFF |
Translation | Nehht son of Talorg, 'quenched' Kineff |
Site | Logie Elphinstone, Chapel of Garioch, Aberdeenshire |
NGR | NJ 7034 2588 |
Current Location | In the garden of Logie Elphinstone House. |
History | Originally located on the Moor of Carden, to the west of Logie Elphinstone House; built into a plantation wall when the moor was planted in 1821; moved to the garden of Logie Elphinstone House by 1843. |
Description | Pictish symbol stone with a "wheel Ogham" engraved one a single circular stem near the apex. |
Dimensions | 1.37 × 0.76 × 0.45 m. |
Date | |
Notes | The circular Ogham inscription does not make any obvious sense, and is probably a cypher. Forsyth reads the inscription as "Q V T Q U", but the start point and direction of the inscription are uncertain, so other readings are possible. |
References |
CISP LPHIN/1 Canmore Canmore 18855 |
Canmore SC 1080265 Drawing by John Borland, © Crown Copyright: HES |
Ogham Text | ᚊᚃᚈᚊᚒ (circular stemline, reading clockwise from the top) |
Transcription | QFTQU |
Reading | Q. V. T. Q. U. |
Translation |
Site | Mains of Afforsk, Oyne, Aberdeenshire |
NGR | NJ 6956 2085 |
Current Location | In situ. |
History | Stone identified in 1994, lying near a cairn in a clearing in a Forestry Commission plantation. |
Description | Granite boulder with a simple cross engraved on its upper surface, and Ogham inscriptions along the north and south edges. |
Dimensions | 1.50 × 0.95 × 0.80 m. |
Date | |
Notes | |
References |
CISP MAINS/1 Canmore Canmore 80727 |
Canmore SC 699546 Rubbing by John Borland, © Crown Copyright: HES |
Ogham Text | ᚅᚕᚉᚈᚑᚅ (south edge) |
ᚏ ᚕ (north edge) | |
Transcription | [--]NXCTON[--] | [--]RX[--] |
Reading | NÉCTON[I] | [--]RÉ[--] |
Translation | Of Necton [...] |
Site | Newton House, Culsalmond, Aberdeenshire |
NGR | NJ 6623 2972 |
Current Location | East side of Newton House. |
History | Found in 1804 in a plantation near Shevock toll-bar, on the slope of a hill above Shevock Burn, ¾ mile south of Newton House; moved to the grounds of Newton House by 1856. |
Description | Granite pillar stone with an undeciphered alphabetic inscription in debased Roman cursive or miniscule script, comprising 46 letters in six rows, towards the top of the front face. There is an Ogham inscription running down the left edge of the stone, and an additional, shorter Ogham inscription on an artificial stemline running parallel and to the right of the main Ogham inscription. |
Dimensions | 2.09 × 0.70 × 0.40 m. |
Date | |
Notes |
The main inscription on the Newton Stone has been variously identified as Phoenician or Brahmi or some unknown script, but modern scholarly opinion is that it is written in debased Roman cursive or miniscule letters. No convincing reading of the main inscription has yet been made. William Bannerman reads: "ETTE | CUNANMAIN | MAOLOUOEG | UN+ROFIIS·I | H-INSSI | LOAOARUIN" Draw near to the soul of Moluag from whom came knowledge (of the faith). He was of the Island of Lorn. ( "The Newton Stone, a critical examination and translation of its main inscription"; in Proceedings of the Society (1907) pages 56–63). F. C. Diack reads: "ETTE | EVAGAINNIAS | CIGONOVOCANI | URAELISI | MAQQI | NOVIOGRUTA" (The Newton Stone and other Pictish Inscriptions (Paisley, 1922)). The Ogham inscription is unintelligible, but may comprise two personal names followed by either Old Irish koi ᚕᚑᚔ "here" (corresponding to Latin hic iacit) or Pictish ipe ᚔᚘᚓ "nephew" (depending upon the interpretation of the X-shaped Ogham letter), followed by a third personal name. |
References |
CISP NEWT/1 Canmore Canmore 18084 |
J. R. Allen and J. Anderson, The Early Christian Monuments of Scotland (Edinburgh, 1903) fig. 215 |
Ogham Text | ᚔᚇᚇᚐᚏᚏᚅᚅᚅᚃᚑᚏᚏᚓᚅᚅᚔᚕᚑᚈᚉ (left edge, top-to-bottom) |
ᚏᚑᚄᚏᚏ (artificial stemline, top-to-bottom) | |
Transcription | IDDAR[R]NNNFORRENNI[K^P]O[T^C] [C^E] | [R]OSR[R] |
Reading | IDDAR[R]NNN VORRENNI KO<I> [T][C][R]OSR[R] (Forsyth) |
IDDAR[R]NNN VORRENN IPO [T][C][R]OSR[R] (Forsyth) | |
Translation |
Site | Roseisle, Moray |
NGR | NJ 1374 6633 |
Current Location | By the drive from Altyre House to Forres (NJ 0391 5537). |
History | Originally located somewhere in the Laich of Moray, reportedly st College Field at the village of Roseisle; moved to its current position in the grounds of Altyre House in about 1820. The Ogham inscription was not recognised until the early 20th century. |
Description | A sandstone cross slab with an Ogham inscription running up the left edge of the front face. |
Dimensions | 3.3 × 0.86 × 0.18 m. |
Date | |
Notes | The Ogham inscription is severly weathered and covered in lichen. |
References |
CISP ALTYR/1 Canmore Canmore 15812 |
Canmore DP 099198 Photograph by Steve Wallace, © Crown Copyright: HES |
Ogham Text | ᚐᚋᚋᚐᚊᚊᚊᚐᚂᚋᚃᚄᚋᚐᚆᚆᚏᚐᚏᚐᚄᚄᚒᚇᚇᚄ |
Transcription | [--]AMMAQQ[Q!]A[L!]M[F][S]MAHHR[A!]R[A!][S]S[U]DDS |
Reading | [--]AM MAQQ [Q]A[L]M[VS] MAHHR[A]R[A][S]S[U]DDS |
Translation |
Local Name | Rodney's Stone |
Site | Brodie Castle, Dyke and Moy, Moray |
NGR | NH 9900 5840 |
Current Location | At the side of the drive of Brodie Castle (NH 98425 57665). |
History | Discovered in 1781 in the graveyard of the old church when digging the foundations for a new church. The stone was erected in Dyke village in 1782, and named "Rodney's Stone" in comemmoration of Admiral Rodney's victory at the Battle of the Saintes. The stone was moved to the grounds of Brodie Castle, 1 km to the southwest, during the 1820s or 1830s. The stone was subject to 3D laser scanning by Deri Jones & Associates in 2010. |
Description | Sandstone cross slab with an interlaced cross on the front face, and Pictish symbols, including a pair of sea monsters and an "elephant", on the back face. A badly weathered Ogham inscription runs along three of the four edges (front right edge, rear left edge, and rear right edge). |
Dimensions | 1.87 × 1.9 × 0.95 m. |
Date | |
Notes | The Ogham inscription is only legible in parts, and its overall meaning is unclear. The Brythonic personal name Eddarrnonn has been identified. |
References |
CISP BROD/1 Canmore Canmore 15529 |
Photograph by Otter, 30 April 2008, CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Photograph by Otter, 30 April 2008, CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Ogham Text | |
Transcription | [--][F]ON[O!][L!^D!]ECCO[I!^B!][--] | R[G^O]I[N^R][AG^MG^NG][C][H![--][Q]O[D^T]T{O}ST[O]S[--] | EDDARRNONN[--][T][T]I[--]RR[--][E!][--][E!][--] |
Reading | |
Translation |
Site | Ackergill, Wick, Caithness, Highland |
NGR | ND 3483 5499 |
Current Location | National Museum of Scotland [IB 168]. |
History | Found in 1896 on the golf course at the south side of Keiss Bay. Donated to the National Museum of Antiquities of Scotland in 1897. |
Description | Slate slab with two Pictish symbols (a spiral-filled rectangle and part of a salmon), and an Ogham inscription engraved on an artificial stemline at an oblique angle to the rectangle symbol. The slab was broken into several pieces when found, and was later cemented together, but part the slab is missing, resulting in the loss of most of the salmon symbol and perhaps some of the Ogham inscription. |
Dimensions | 1.2 × 0.6 × 0.08 m. |
Date | |
Notes | The Ogham inscription probably represents an otherwise unattested personal name. |
References |
CISP ACKGL/1 Canmore Canmore 319880 |
Dr Adrián Maldonado, Rethinking the Dark Age: the multiple voices of early medieval Britain (17 December 2019) |
Ogham Text | ᚅᚓᚆᚈᚓᚈᚏᚔ (bottom-to-top) |
Transcription | NEHTETRI |
Reading | NEHTETRI |
Translation | Nehtetri |
Site | Golspie, Sutherland, Highland |
NGR | NC 8370 0020 |
Current Location | Dunrobin Castle Museum (Acc. No. 15/15A) |
History | Originally sited in the churchyard of the parish church at Golspie (earliest reference 1630); moved to Dunrobin Castle Museum in 1868. |
Description | Sandstone cross slab with a cross with interlaced decoration on the front face, and various Pictish symbols and images on the back face. An Ogham inscription runs up the right edge and along the top edge of the back face. |
Dimensions | 1.83 × 0.82 × 0.17 m. |
Date | |
Notes | The inscription is Old Irish, with the words ail "rock" (extended meaning "monument") and nia "nephew" (here possibly part of a personal name, either "MacNia" or "NiaFercar"). |
References |
CISP GOLPI/1 Canmore Canmore 6564 |
Canmore SC 341750 John Stuart, The Sculptured Stones of Scotland vol. 1 (1856) plate 34 |
Ogham Text | ᚐᚂᚂᚆᚆᚐᚇᚇᚑᚏᚏᚕᚇᚇᚋᚐᚊᚊᚅᚔᚐᚃᚃᚐᚏᚏᚉᚓᚏᚏ (right edge, bottom-to-top) |
Transcription | ALLHHALLORRXDDM[A]QQN[I^IA^UU]FF[H^A][RR^NI][C^E][-][RR^QQ] |
Reading | ALL HHALLORRÉDD M[A]QQ N[IA] FF[A][RR][C][E][RR] |
Translation | The monument of Alored, son of the nephew of Fercar |
Site | Latheron, Caithness, Highland |
NGR | ND 1981 3315 |
Current Location | National Museum of Scotland [IB 183]. |
History | Discovered in 1903, built into the inside wall of a barn, ¼ mile south of Latheron Post Office. Donated to the National Museum of Antiquities of Scotland in 1905. |
Description | Part of a sandstone cross slab, with images of an osprey, fish and two horsemen beneath the cross, and an Ogham inscription on an artificial stemline running parallel to the left edge. The slab is broken at the bottom, and the entire upper part of the slab is missing. |
Dimensions | 0.915 × 0.43 × 0.10 m. |
Date | 700–850 (Forsyth) |
Notes | |
References |
CISP LARON/1 Canmore Canmore 8144 |
Canmore SC 948806 Photograph by Francis Tress Barry (1825–1907) |
Ogham Text | ᚇᚒᚅᚅᚑᚇᚅᚅᚐᚈᚋᚐᚊᚊᚅᚓᚈᚒ |
Transcription | DU[N]NODNNATMAQQNET[U][--] |
Reading | DU[N]NODNN{A}T M{A}QQ NET[U][--] |
Translation | Dunnodnnat, son of Netu[..] |
Site | Brough of Birsay, Mainland, Orkney |
NGR | HY 2399 2850 |
Current Location | Lost (last seen in 1971). |
History | Found in 1920, as part of an 11th-century structure known as Thorfinn's Palace. Kept at the Department of the Environment in Edinburgh until it was lost some time between 1971 and 1996. |
Description | Squarish slab, broken in two and cemented together, with an Ogham inscription along one edge. |
Dimensions | 0.62 × 0.3 × 0.11 m. |
Date | 500–1199 (Forsyth) |
Notes | The inscription probably represents a single personal name. |
References | CISP BIRSY/1 |
Ogham Text | ᚋᚑᚅᚅᚑᚏᚏᚐᚅᚏᚏ |
Transcription | [M]ONNORR{A}[N]RR |
Reading | [M]ONNORRA[N]RR |
Translation | Monnorranrr |
Site | Brough of Birsay, Mainland, Orkney |
NGR | HY 2399 2850 |
Current Location | Lost (last seen in 1971). |
History | Found on the beach some time prior to 1945; first discussed in print in 1962. Kept at the Department of the Environment in Edinburgh until it was lost some time between 1971 and 1996. |
Description | Irregular-shaped slab with an Ogham inscription on its surface. |
Dimensions | 0.37 × 0.24 × 0.05 m. |
Date | |
Notes | The stone is weathered and water-worn, and only a fragment of a longer inscription survives. |
References | CISP BIRSY/2 |
Ogham Text | ᚋᚐᚊᚔ ᚈᚐᚋ |
Transcription | [--][B^A^M][A]QI:[T]A[B^A^M][--] |
Reading | [--][M][A]QI [T]A[M][--] |
Translation | Tam[...], son of ... |
Site | Brough of Birsay, Mainland, Orkney |
NGR | HY 2399 2850 |
Current Location | Department of Archaeology, University of Glasgow (?) |
History | Discovered in 1980 during archaeological excavations, where it had been used as a paving stone. |
Description | Irregular slab of Stromness flagstone, with an Ogham inscription engraved on an artificial stemline along one side. |
Dimensions | 0.31 × 0.35 × 0.06 m. |
Date | < 600 (Forsyth) |
Notes | |
References |
CISP BIRSY/3 Canmore Canmore 310502 |
Canmore DP 097418 Photograph © RCAHMS |
Ogham Text | ᚋᚐᚊᚊᚔ |
Transcription | [--][MA]QQ[I][--] |
Reading | [--] [MA]QQ[I] [--] |
Translation | ..., son of ... |
Site | Broch of Burrian, North Ronaldsay, Orkney |
NGR | HY 7627 5138 |
Current Location | National Museum of Scotland [GB 1] |
History | Discovered in 1870 during archaeological excavations. Donated to the National Museum of Antiquities of Scotland in 1871. |
Description | Slate slab with a Celtic cross and part of a fish engraved on one face. An Ogham inscription on an artificial stemline is engraved to the side of the cross. |
Dimensions | 0.7 × 0.39 × 0.05 m. |
Date | |
Notes |
Ogham inscription is written with bind oghams, and includes some unusual Ogham letterforms, in particular the hashed double-R letter in the word "CERROCCS" that is not yet encoded in Unicode. The inscription has an X-shaped letter in two places. The first instance is written as an X-shape (ᚕ) and is normally read as a consonant 'K' (Allen & Anderson read it as a 'P'), whereas the second instance is written as a disjoined X (ᚕ) and has been universally read as a vowel 'E'. The reading of the same letter as both a vowel and a consonant troubles me. According to Forsyth and others the last word reads "CERROCCS", meaning cross (as a borrowing from Latin crux), but the 'E' is unexpected, and on other Ogham inscriptions the word is spelt "CRROSCC" (BREAY/1) and"CROSQC". This makes me suspect that the X-shaped letter (ᚕ) here represents 'K' rather 'E', and the word should be read "KRROCCS", with the 'C' going with the previous word ("KEVVC" ?). |
References |
CISP BURIN/1 Canmore Canmore 259534 |
J. R. Allen and J. Anderson, The Early Christian Monuments of Scotland (Edinburgh, 1903) fig. 20 |
Ogham Text | ᚔ ᚔᚏᚐᚏᚐᚅᚅᚒ ᚏᚏᚐᚉᚈᚕᚓᚃᚃᚉᚕᚏᚏᚑᚉᚉᚄ |
Transcription | I[T!^O!][E^B]IR[A]RANN[U][-]RRACTXEFFCX{RR}OCCS |
Reading | I[--]IRRANN U[-]RRACT KEVV CÉRROCCS |
Translation | I[...]irrann made this (?) cross (Forsyth) |
Site | Pool, Sanday, Orkney |
NGR | HY 6194 3785 |
Current Location | Orkney Museum, Kirkwall, Mainland, Orkney |
History | Discovered in 1984 during archaeological excavations, where it had been used as an upright building slab. |
Description | Broken slab with an Ogham inscription engraved on an artificial stemline across the surface of the stone. |
Dimensions | 0.85 × 0.5 × 0.6 m. |
Date | |
Notes | |
References |
CISP POOL/1 Canmore Canmore 3422 |
Ogham Text | ᚄᚏᚑᚈᚐᚈᚏ |
Transcription | [--][S]ROTATR[--] |
Reading | [--][S]ROTATR[--] |
Translation |
Site | Cullingsburgh, Bressay, Shetland |
NGR | HU 5210 4230 |
Current Location | National Museum of Scotland [IB 109] |
History | Found in 1852 or earlier when digging waste land near the old churchyard of St. Mary at Culbinsgarth. The stone was moved to the churchyard at Bressay; then taken to Newcastle; returned to Shetland; and finally donated to the National Museum of Antiquities of Scotland in 1864. |
Description | Schist cross slab decorated with Norse-style figures and animals on both sides, and with Ogham inscriptions on artificial stemlines running up both sides. |
Dimensions | 1.15 × 0.4 × 0.05 m. |
Date | |
Notes | This inscription is notable for having a number of unusual Ogham letters and letterforms, as discussed at the top of this page. Forsyth identifies the words "CRROSCC" (cf. BURIN/1 "CERROCCS") as Goidelic "cross" (from Latin crux), "MEQQ" as Goidelic maq "son", and DATTR as Old Norse dóttir "daughter". She also suggests that the persoal names Nahhtvddadds and Benises are Norse, and the name Droann is Goidelic, indicating that the inscription reflects a mixed Gaelic and Norse environment. The use of the double-dot punctuation mark found on Norse Runic inscriptions is also indicative of Norse influence. My opinion is that the first part of "NAHHTVVDDADDS" is equivalent to "NEHHTV" in FRMSN/1 |
References |
CISP BREAY/1 Canmore Canmore 1279 |
Canmore SC 346140 John Stuart, The Sculptured Stones of Scotland vol. 1 (1856) plate 94 |
Canmore SC 346139 John Stuart, The Sculptured Stones of Scotland vol. 1 (1856) plate 95 |
Ogham Text | ᚛ᚉᚏᚏᚑᚄᚉᚉ᛬ᚅᚐᚆᚆᚈᚃᚃᚇᚇᚐᚇᚇᚄ᛬ᚇᚐᚈᚈᚏᚏ᛬ᚐᚅᚅ (right side, bottom-to-top) |
ᚁᚓᚅᚅᚔᚄᚓᚄ᛬ᚋᚓᚊᚊᚇᚇᚏᚏᚖᚐᚅᚅ (left side, bottom-to-top) | |
Transcription | CRROSCC : NAHHTFFDDA{D}{D}S : DATTRR : {A}NN[--] | BENN{I}SES : MEQQDD{RR}ÓANN[--] |
Reading | CRROSCC NAHHTVVDDADDS DATTRR ANN[--] BENISES MEQQ DDROANN[--] |
Translation | The cross of Nahhtvddadds, daughter of Ann[...], and Benises, son of Droann[...] |
Site | Chapel Mail, Cunningsburgh, Mainland, Shetland |
NGR | HU 4324 2791 |
Current Location | National Museum of Scotland [IB 114] |
History | Found in 1875 in the chapel graveyard. |
Description | Irregular-shaped sandstone slab, a fragment of a larger monument, with part of a design in a square border on one side and a short fragment of an Ogham inscription on an artificial stemline on the other side. |
Dimensions | 0.24 × 0.2 × 0.45 m. |
Date | |
Notes | Ogham inscription is written with bind oghams. Forsyth's reading indicates a letter (H or D) between the I and the R that is not shown in Allen & Anderson's drawing shown below, and she also states that the two angular strokes are bound at the tips and the bind line extends beyond the second angled stroke. |
References |
CISP CBURG/1 Canmore Canmore 938 |
J. R. Allen and J. Anderson, The Early Christian Monuments of Scotland (Edinburgh, 1903) fig. 11 |
Ogham Text | ᚔᚇᚏᚒ |
Transcription | [--]I[H^D]R[U!][--] |
Reading | |
Translation |
Site | Chapel Mail, Cunningsburgh, Mainland, Shetland |
NGR | HU 4324 2791 |
Current Location | National Museum of Scotland [IB 115] |
History | Found in 1874 or 1875 in the chapel graveyard; donated to the National Museum of Antiquities of Scotland in 1883. |
Description | Irregular-shaped sandstone slab, a fragment of a larger monument, with two fragments of an Ogham inscription, one along an edge of the stone and one on artificial stemline parallel to the edge. |
Dimensions | 0.3 × 0.19 × 0.65 m. |
Date | |
Notes | Forsyth suggests that the second line, "EHTECONMOR[S]", may represent Pictish ette-conmor-s "this is as great as" (cf. "ETTECUHETTS" ette-cuhett-s "this is far as" of LTING/1), where ette means "this is", conmor means "big", and s is an affixed demonstrative. On the other hand, "EHTE" is reminiscent of the supposed Pictish personal names "NEHTETRI" of ACKGL/1, "NEHHTV" of FRMSN/1, "NAHHTVVDDADDS" of BREAY/1, and "NEHHTON[N]" of LTING/1. |
References | CISP CBURG/2 |
J. R. Allen and J. Anderson, The Early Christian Monuments of Scotland (Edinburgh, 1903) fig. 10 |
Ogham Text | ᚇᚓᚃᚑᚇᚇᚏᚓ (top edge, left-to-right) |
ᚓᚆᚈᚓᚉᚑᚅᚋᚑᚏ (bottom line, left-to-right) | |
Transcription | [--]D[E]F[O]DDR[E][--] | [--]EHTECONMOR[--] |
Reading | |
Translation |
Site | Chapel Mail, Cunningsburgh, Mainland, Shetland |
NGR | HU 4324 2791 |
Current Location | National Museum of Scotland [IB 182] |
History | Found in 1903 when digging a grave in the chapel graveyard. |
Description | Sandstone slab, a fragment of a larger monument, with three fragments of an Ogham inscription on artificial stemlines on one side. |
Dimensions | 0.44 × 0.26 × 0.5 m. |
Date | |
Notes | Forsyth suggests that the three surviving sections of Ogham inscription formed a single spiral-shaped inscription. |
References | CISP CBURG/3 |
Ogham Text | |
Transcription | +TTEC[O^G][--] | [--]A[V^BL]:DATT[V][B!][--] | [--][A!]VVR[--] |
Reading | ETTEC[O^G] [--][A!]VVR[--]A[V^BL]: DATT[V][B!][--] |
Translation |
Site | Lunnasting, Mainland, Shetland |
NGR | HU 4600 6500 |
Current Location | National Museum of Scotland [IB 113] |
History | Found by Rev. J. C. Roger (who witnessed the discovery of STNIN/1 just one month earlier) in 1876, buried about 2 m beneath a peat bog; donated to the National Museum of Antiquities of Scotland in 1876. |
Description | Sandstone slab with an Ogham inscription engraved on an artificial stemline on one surface, and a cross mark in one corner. |
Dimensions | 1.12 × 0.33 × 0.04 m. |
Date | 700–900 (Forsyth) |
Notes | Ogham inscription is written with bind oghams, and has several unusual letterforms, and double-dot punctuation marks. The personal names Ahehhttannn and Nehhtonn (cf. the common Pictish name Nechtan) have been identified in the inscription. |
References |
CISP LTING/1 Canmore Canmore 1190 |
Canmore SC 1134197 Drawing by Ian Gordon Scott, © HES. Ian G Scott Collection |
Ogham Text | ᚕᚈᚈᚗᚉᚒᚆᚕᚈᚈᚄ᛬ᚐᚆᚕᚆᚆᚈᚈᚐᚅᚅᚅ᛬ᚆᚉᚉᚃᚃᚓᚃᚃ᛬ᚅᚓᚆᚆᚈᚑᚅᚅ |
Transcription | XTT{Ú}CUHXTTS : AHXHHTTANNN : HCCFFEFF : NEHHTON[S!] |
Reading | ÉTTÚCUHÉTTS AHÉHHTTANNN HCCVVEVV NEHHTON[N] |
Translation |
Site | St. Ninian's Isle, Mainland, Shetland |
NGR | HU 3680 2080 |
Current Location | National Museum of Scotland [IB 112] |
History | Found by Shetland antiquarian Gilbert Goudie in the sands at St. Ninian's Isle in 1876; donated to the National Museum of Antiquities of Scotland in 1877. |
Description | Sandstone slab with an Ogham inscription on an artifical stemline along one of the sides. |
Dimensions | 0.76 × 0.26 × 0.45 m. |
Date | < 700 (Forsyth) |
Notes | |
References | CISP STNIN/1 |
Dr Adrián Maldonado, Rethinking the Dark Age: the multiple voices of early medieval Britain (17 December 2019) |
J. R. Allen and J. Anderson, The Early Christian Monuments of Scotland (Edinburgh, 1903) fig. 13 |
Ogham Text | ᚁᚓᚄᚋᚓᚊᚊᚅᚐᚅᚐᚋᚋᚑᚃᚃᚓᚎ |
Transcription | [--][B!]ESMEQQNANAMMOFFEZ |
Reading | [--][B]ES MEQQ NANAMMOVVEZ |
Translation | [...]bes, son of Nannamovvest |
Site | St. Ninian's Isle, Mainland, Shetland |
NGR | HU 3680 2080 |
Current Location | Lost (last seen in 1878). |
History | Found by Gilbert Goudie in the sands at St. Ninian's Isle in 1876, in the same location that he found STNIN/1. |
Description | |
Dimensions | |
Date | |
Notes | |
References | CISP STNIN/2 |
Site | St. Ninian's Isle, Mainland, Shetland |
NGR | HU 3680 2080 |
Current Location | Lost (last seen in 1878). |
History | Found by Gilbert Goudie in the sands at St. Ninian's Isle in 1876, in the same location that he found STNIN/1. |
Description | |
Dimensions | |
Date | |
Notes | |
References | CISP STNIN/3 |
Site | St. Ola's, Whiteness, Mainland, Shetland |
NGR | HU 3866 4442 |
Current Location | National Museum of Scotland [IB 256] |
History | Found in the churchyard of St. Ola's at Whiteness (date and circumstances unknown); donated to the National Museum of Antiquities of Scotland in 1946 or 1947. |
Description | Sandstone slab, a fragment of a larger monument, with an interlaced knot design and an Ogham inscription on an artificial stemline on one side. |
Dimensions | 0.18 × 0.22 × 0.07 m. |
Date | 900–999 (Forsyth) |
Notes | Ogham inscription is written with bind oghams. Another fragment of the same stone, with more of the interlaced knot design (but no Ogham inscription), is held at the Shetland Museum (ARC 8057). |
References |
CISP WNESS/1 Canmore Canmore 712 |
Canmore SC 1134145 Drawing of the NMS and Shetland Museum fragments by Ian Gordon Scott, 2 July 2008, © HES. Ian G Scott Collection |
Ogham Text | ᚅᚅᚇᚐᚏ |
Transcription | [--][F!]NDAR |
Reading | [--][N]NDAR |
Translation |
The following conventions are used in the transcription of Latin, Runic and Ogham inscriptions :
Letter | Name | Transcription | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
ᚁ | Beith | B | |
ᚂ | Luis | L | |
ᚃ | Fearn | F | Read as F or V. |
ᚄ | Sail | S | |
ᚅ | Nion | N | |
ᚆ | Uath | H | |
ᚇ | Dair | D | Variants include 'Rabbit-eared D'. |
ᚈ | Tinne | T | |
ᚉ | Coll | C | |
ᚊ | Ceirt | Q | |
ᚋ | Muin | M | |
ᚌ | Gort | G | |
ᚍ | nGéadal | W | Read as Ng or Gw. |
ᚎ | Straif | Z | Read as Z or St. |
ᚏ | Ruis | R | Double R is occasionally written as a crosshatched ligature. |
ᚐ | Ailm | A | Variants include 'Hammerhead A' and 'S-shaped A'. |
ᚑ | Onn | O | |
ᚒ | Úr | U | |
ᚓ | Eadhadh | E | |
ᚔ | Iodhadh | I | |
ᚕ | Eabhadh | X | Read as É or K. |
ᚖ | Ór | Ó | |
ᚗ | Uilleann | Ú | |
ᚘ | Ifin | P | Written as a single cross under the stemline in epigraphic texts. |
ᚙ | Eamhancholl | Not found in epigraphic texts. |
This page makes use of the set of 12 BabelStone Ogham fonts, which provide a variety of different styles of Ogham lettering (stemline and stemless, bound and unbound, straight strokes and angled strokes). Web font (WOFF) versions should be automatically downloaded and applied to this page, but if you want to install these fonts on your local system they may be downloaded for free here.
Last revised: 2024-05-20
Index of BabelStone Blog Posts